BackHomeNext
From Uneasy Peace to Bitter Conflict

32a. The Dred Scott Decision

Dred Scott
Missouri Historical Society
Portrait of Dred Scott by Louis Schultze, painted from a photograph.

From the 1780s, the question of whether slavery would be permitted in new territories had threatened the Union. Over the decades, many compromises had been made to avoid disunion. But what did the Constitution say on this subject? This question was raised in 1857 before the Supreme Court in case of Dred Scott vs. Sandford. Dred Scott was a slave of an army surgeon, John Emerson. Scott had been taken from Missouri to posts in Illinois and what is now Minnesota for several years in the 1830s, before returning to Missouri. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 had declared the area including Minnesota free. In 1846, Scott sued for his freedom on the grounds that he had lived in a free state and a free territory for a prolonged period of time. Finally, after eleven years, his case reached the Supreme Court. At stake were answers to critical questions, including slavery in the territories and citizenship of African-Americans. The verdict was a bombshell.

The Issue of Slavery

Who should have decided whether slavery was legal in the United States?

The President

The Congress

The Supreme Court

  • The Court ruled that Scott's "sojourn" of two years to Illinois and the Northwest Territory did not make him free once he returned to Missouri.
  • The Court further ruled that as a black man Scott was excluded from United States citizenship and could not, therefore, bring suit. According to the opinion of the Court, African-Americans had not been part of the "sovereign people" who made the Constitution.
  • The Court also ruled that Congress never had the right to prohibit slavery in any territory. Any ban on slavery was a violation of the Fifth Amendment, which prohibited denying property rights without due process of law.
  • The Missouri Compromise was therefore unconstitutional.
Old Courthouse
Dred Scott's battle for his freedom began at the Old Courthouse in St. Louis, Missouri.

The Chief Justice of the United States was Roger B. Taney, a former slave owner, as were four other southern justices on the Court. The two dissenting justices of the nine-member Court were the only Republicans. The north refused to accept a decision by a Court they felt was dominated by "Southern fire-eaters." Many Northerners, including Abraham Lincoln, felt that the next step would be for the Supreme Court to decide that no state could exclude slavery under the Constitution, regardless of their wishes or their laws.

Two of the three branches of government, the Congress and the President, had failed to resolve the issue. Now the Supreme Court rendered a decision that was only accepted in the southern half of the country. Was the American experiment collapsing? The only remaining national political institution with both northern and southern strength was the Democratic Party, and it was now splitting at the seams. The fate of the Union looked hopeless.

On the Web
Dred Scott v. John F. A. Sandford
Chief Justice Roger B. Taney delivered the now infamous opinion of the Supreme Court in the Dred Scott case, and the text is available on this webpage. But six other justices concurred with the decision, and two dissented. Each of them also wrote opinions which are found here as well and which provide further insight into the court's judgment.
Dred Scott's Fight for Freedom
A nice overview of "the most infamous case in (the Supreme Court's) history" is offered at this webpage from the Public Broadcasting Service. All the highlights of Scott's long pursuit of freedom are here, as well as links to more onsite information about the decision and contemporary issues and events.
Historic Inns & Famous Homes in Frederick
This virtual tour of historic homes and buildings in Frederick County, Maryland, includes a description and picture of Chief Justice Roger B. Taney's summer home from 1815 to 1823. The building also serves as a museum devoted to Francis Scott Key who wrote the Star Spangled Banner. This is not the result of mere coincidence. The men were brothers-in-law and once shared a law office.
Lincoln's Speech on the Dred Scott Decision
In June, 1857, Republican Abraham Lincoln responded to a speech delivered 2 weeks earlier by Democrat Stephen Douglas in which Douglas had applauded the Supreme Court's decision on the Dred Scott case. Here you can read all of Lincoln's speech.
The Dred Scott Case (1857)
From the climate in America in 1857 and the background Dred Scott's suit for freedom to the impact of the Supreme Court's decision, this website by a Brown University student presents a comprehensive look at this important event. The report is well-researched, and the hyperlinked footnotes help you find more informative sources.
The Dred Scott Case
The decision of the Supreme Court in the Dred Scott case shook a nation to its core. This website from Washington University in St. Louis provides the primary source documents for this important case with photos of the original documents and readable transcriptions of each. In total eighty-five documents are provided, along with a timeline chronicling the events of Dred Scott's life.
Although Dred Scott lost his case, he lived his final 10 months a free man.
Learn More...
Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, famous for writing the majority opinion of the Supreme Court's Dred Scott decision, and Francis Scott Key, famous for writing the Star Spangled Banner, shared a law office in Frederick, Maryland.
Learn More...
Listen to the story of Harriet Scott, who survived her husband Dred and lived to see the end of slavery in the United States.
Learn More...
del.icio.us Facebook Digg Furl Netscape Yahoo! My Web StumbleUpon Google Bookmarks Technorati BlinkList Newsvine ma.gnolia reddit Windows Live
BackHomeNext
historic documents, declaration, constitution, more